Location can be used like a types of splitting the surroundings into conceptual elements and analyzing the surroundings. It's hard to look at atmosphere and room because they are also common.
You might firstly need to create this is of location concept as peopleis conversation using their actual atmosphere is just a primary in ecological psychology to comprehend the idea of ecological psychology. The area concept has three elements which are interconnected with one another (view figure 1). These three elements are individual actions, concepts and bodily characteristics. Based on Canter (1997) a location is just a state-of equilibrium developed by the conversation between individual actions, concepts and also the bodily characteristics of the surroundings seen from the historic perspective. Nevertheless, Castello (2006) says that location is just a device where bodily type and individual encounters are merged together, developing a framework that is unitary.
The actual characteristics of the area concept shows the environment or atmosphere where a person discovers herself, like a room, an office etc. A geographer, Edward Relph (1976), includes a comparable idea of location but changed Canteris (1997) facet of concepts with encounters. Hence, permitting extra information to become collected concerning the location as encounters really are a consequence of every day life and a person's background. The kinds of individual actions and also the manner in which it's completed are contingent on elements for example understanding, social history, ideals, in addition to official and casual handles (Ndubisi, 2002). Consequently, the area concept shows that locations are considered alternative models of actions, meaning and bodily type formed reasons and from the objectives of people.
The area concept also operates with location connection and location identification. Several scientists discover this powerful connection between location and people. Place connection and location identification are ideas that show the substantial relationships between location and an individual. Furthermore, when people connect to their atmosphere, they produce links and ties as well as their environment grows meaning.
There are lots of facets that form individual identification, and identity is (among other activities) an item of the psychical atmosphere (Hauge, 2007). Dixon and Durrheim (2000) suggest that a vital second in ecological therapyis review of the disembodied idea of identity was the book of Proshansky, Fabian, and Kaminoff's document on location identification. Location identification, based on Proshansky (1987), could be understood to be:
Fairly ETAL (2003) suggest that location identification is just a mental framework which plays a role in worldwide home- cultural identification procedures and categorisation. Based on Knez (2005): Breakwell (1986, 1992, 1993), Twigger-Ross and Uzzell (1996), Twigger-Ross ETAL (2003), and Vignoles (2000) has recommended four procedures associated with location identification:
Therefore, these procedures motivate our self-esteem identification and as people. Thus the concerns of "who we're" are usually totally associated with concerns of "where we're" (Dixon & Durrheim 2000; Fairly ETAL 2003). The locations individuals fit in with doesn't simply motivate their self esteem but additionally their choices that are ecological, and just how they discover themselves. Since when a person recognizes herself using the environment, people often experience mounted on the environment location identification may also result in location connection.
Every one people is promoting a spontaneous relationship towards some location over an interval of time. It's recommended by Inalhan and Finch (2004) the idea of location connection is complicated and multi faceted, as location connection hasbeen analyzed by students from many professions such as for instance; anthropology, architecture, household and customer reports, tradition, gerontology, landscape architecture, therapy and metropolitan planning. Location connection can differ from spot to location and certainly will alter quickly with respect to the level of belonging of the individual (Knez 2005). Hence, connection a person's degree has towards a place might decide fulfillment and the ideas of the individual within the particular location. Your connection to some location develops with period of time residing in era and a location, but mainly through good conversation using a neighborhood. Based on Milligan (1998) location connection might be understood to be:
Nevertheless location connection, based on Knez (2005), could be understood to be:
Scientists and many reports present that there's not one approved description of location connection. The meaning provided by Milligan (1998) acts a much better objective for this research. Out of this description it's obvious that location connection is definitely an emotional relationship shaped by someone to some real environment because of the meaning directed at the place through procedures of individual-atmosphere relationships (Casakin & Kreitler, 2008).
Based on Halpenny (2005), among the facets that may are likely involved within the development of place connection is fulfillment having a location. Furthermore, if folks are pleased with their surroundings go back to it and they often guard that location more.
Payton (2003) and Warzecha et al (2000) suggest that location attachment has two primary ideas which have been predominant in literature: practical location attachment and psychological spot connection.
Practical spot connection describes the performance or even the capability of the assets to meet up the requirements or objectives of people. Moreover, practical location connection can also be strongly linked to actions users' type follow. The reason being some actions need particular elements while alternative activities are far more common and are far more complicated. Shumaker and Taylor (1983) claim that practical connection can also be known as location reliance. The idea is suffering from two facets (Shumaker & Taylor, 1983):
Psychological location connection describes the psychological characteristics of the person-location connection and just how location plays a role in an individuals identification. Shumaker and Taylor (1983) state that psychological attachment can also be known as remarkable connection. Furthermore, psychological location connection it is shaped over a particular interval through several activities using the atmosphere and could be centered on psychological connections to some particular location. Based on Warzecha et al (2000), psychological location connection can also be indicated being an identification having a symbolic meaning or concept.
Location concept above type a simple starting place for almost any research in ecological therapy and its elements mentioned.
There are many individuals who don't understand what it includes and what ecological therapy is. Typically, ecological therapy has centered on the interrelationship between surroundings and individual conduct (P Young, 1999; Garling & Golledge, 1993). Based on Gifford (1997) people alter the environment as well as their conduct and encounters are transformed from the atmosphere. Moreover, encounter and every individualis conduct is varies and exclusive in the person standing alongside him/her within the same atmosphere. These environments might be organic environments, interpersonal configurations, constructed environments, learning environments and educational environments (Veith & Arkkelin, 1995).
Ecological therapy also includes ecological mental-procedures when it comes to a definite cultural-psychological viewpoint (Bonnes, 2003). These procedures are personal procedures for example knowledge, notion and character, and interpersonal procedures for example territoriality, individual room, crowding.
Additionally, ecological therapy has continuous components that help determine this area that is relatively unfamiliar. Based on Garling and Golledge (1993), Kaplan and Kaplan (1982) these components are:
These components that are continuous form an important component in things to anticipate because atmosphere in addition to an individualis notion of the environment.
Gifford (1997) says that ecological therapy can also be analyzed at three degrees of evaluation. Analysis' very first degree types and arranges the event of the surroundings based on character, knowledge and ideas of every individual. The following degree of evaluation may be space, which includes four elements namely's combined company; place, individual space, crowding. The final degree of evaluation may be the actual configurations in every single day which people end up.
As mentioned, people sort particular ideas of environments and their environment. Based on Veith and Arkkelin (1995), notion is among the simplest and basic mental procedures by which people interact. Additionally Veitch and Arkkelin (1995) additionally suggest that ideas are extremely intellectual, meaning all surroundings bring some definitions obtained through their particular characteristics. Therefore, these definitions are proven in the atmosphere from the perceiver with regards to their individual values, perceptions and ideals. Moreover, Bechtel ETAL (2002) explain the building of ideas of the real location is of a "molecular" method of the spatial-real setting. Which means that it spots particular interest about the distinct physical-perceptual functions of the surroundings. Based on Bell ETAL (2005) the word physical-ideas hasbeen put on fairly simple exercise of individual sensory methods in responding to some basic toys and developing a notion of the specific atmosphere.
Based on Bonnes ETAL (1995) the word ecological notion can also be frequently used interchangeably with "environmental image", "mental map" and "intellectual map". Nevertheless, based on Bell ETAL (2005) intellectual maps make reference to a psychological construction that retains some illustration for that spatial design of the actual setting. Moreover, Salmi (2002) says that intellectual and wayfinding mapping are not separable, & most people bring several mental routes within their brains. Consequently, individuals are assisted by intellectual maps with another facet of ecological therapy namely.
Wayfinding based on Prestopnik and Roskos-Ewoldsen (2000) could be understood to be the capability to understand effectively through the surroundings. Nevertheless, wayfinding based on Passini (1984) could be understood to be the capability to determine oneis area and get to locations within the atmosphere, both cognitively and behaviourally.
Prestopnik and Roskos-Ewoldsen (2000) shows that wayfinding can't be expected in people as various facets; inner and exterior, enter into play. Inner elements include facets of every individual, such as for instance, sex, knowledge of the surroundings and also the kinds of methods anyone employs to understand through the surroundings (HÃ¶lscher ETAL 2006 and Spiers & Maguire 2008). Exterior components incorporate facets of the actual location, such as for instance, the thickness of the built environment, the accessibility to significant attractions, and also the routine of the roads and intersections in addition to staffed info stands (Salmi 2002).
HÃ¶lscher ETAL (2006; 2009) recognized three wayfinding methods which are used-to help path option choices in 3D multi level structures.
Nevertheless, Spiers and Maguire (2008) recognized their very own wayfinding methods that aid personis using their wayfinding experience.
As previously mentioned above, the actual environment and also ecological therapy are affected through wayfinding in ideas of the surroundings maps in addition to a building. Another element that affects ecological therapy is character of a person. Gifford (1997) noticed that you will find five explanations why character is definitely an essential component in ecological therapy. These five factors are:
Bonnes ETAL (1995) accept Gifford (1997) about the next cause. They claim that the atmosphere and also character are associated with individuals' personality.
Spatial company or company of room is the first main element in wayfinding style since it not just identifies the wayfinding issues of potential customers, but additionally influences the simplicity or trouble users may encounter in knowing and cognitively applying the environment (Passini, 1984). Based on Prestopnik and Roskos-Ewoldsen (2000) spatial alignment duties are affected from the knowledge of the surroundings. Moreover, Iachini ETAL (2009) suggest that individuals that are different discover the environment via a chart, while individuals that are accustomed depend on their long haul encounters using the atmosphere.
Based on Salmi (2002) you will find tips to appear out for in company of room. These factors include:
Based on Salmi (2002) physical configurations should support an ever more, varied populace because it is crucial the environment be made to be as comprehensive and globally available as you can, handling certain requirements of the wide selection of bodily, sensory and intellectual capabilities and requirements. Veitch and Arkkelin (1995) suggest that a variety of behaviors may appear within any actual environment. Furthermore, Bell ETAL (2005) state that actual configurations constrains and equally help or limits the conduct occurring inside it. Veitch and Arkkelin (1995) included that perspective towards a breeding ground may affect an individual's behaviors for example littering and connection towards the location.
With ecological psychology being this type of varied area with a variety of elements, the relationships between your four trendis (solitude, crowding, territoriality and individual room) help tackle issues related to ecological therapy. Gifford (1997) additionally says that ecological therapy is targeted at producing structures more gentle and enhancing our connection using the environment.
Solitude is definitely an essential trend that every person really wants to accomplish on the daily schedule. There are lots of regulations which have been proven regarding people' privacy, like the to privacy. Hence permitting people to possess their very own degree of solitude. The amount of solitude is calculated with regards to another interpersonal procedures of ecological therapy specifically; individual room, territoriality and crowding (Gifford 1997; Veitch and Arkkelin 1995, Bonnes ETAL 1995). Additionally, based on Harris ETAL (1995) and Altman (1975) individuals utilize complicated combinations of spoken, paraverbal, nonverbal and spatial systems to achieve a preferred degree of contact and level of solitude. Faulkner et al (1994) suggest that the amount of solitude is bodily (sleeping, attire) and mental (for improvement and restoration).
Based on Demirbas and Demirkan (2000), the meaning of solitude differs for every person because of the various individual faculties, social backgrounds, intercourse, era, affordable, academic and cultural backgrounds. Ding (2008) identifies solitude whilst the individual control over relationships and/or communications with others. Nevertheless, Gritzalis (2009) suggest that solitude may usually be understood to be the best "to become left ", and therefore it presents a world where it's feasible to stay independent from others, unobserved and unknown. Consequently, it's apparent that solitude describes the way by which individuals handle or control additional people' use of themselves. Nevertheless solitude doesn't required mean removing from individuals (Pederson, 1999; Marshall, 1972), alternatively it entails managing the total amount and kind of contact you have with others.
Gifford (1997) further expresses that it's difficult to evaluate solitude due to the complicated character; because it hasbeen calculated when it comes to conduct, choice, need of every person. Bonnes ETAL (1995) additionally suggest that the main fascination of scientific study hasbeen to review and gauge the more purely inspirational and evaluative elements such as for instance; requirements, objectives and ideals that folks variously keep company with solitude. Harris ETAL (1995) suggest that the obvious connection between solitude, location connection and standard of living suggests the common facets of privacy rules.
Cassidy (1997) noticed that not everybody may respond to solitude within the same manner with regard. Based on Altman (1975) and Westin (1970) there are specific faculties that impact solitude such as for example:
Demirbas and Demirkan (2000) additionally suggest that you will find four kinds of privacy specifically; isolation, book, privacy and closeness. Isolation describes being alone and unobserved by others, that will be whether attractive or natural situation. Book, consequently, implies that people type their surroundings which control invasion as well as obstacles between themselves. Privacy is just a kind of solitude that provides an opportunity to maneuver around in a atmosphere without others identifying them to people. Intimacy describes a person's desire to motivate close personal associations with just people that are favored. Furthermore, Pederson (1999) recognizes two more kinds of solitude; closeness with family (being alone with household) and closeness with friends (being alone with friends).
Based on Harris ETAL (1995) interpersonal capabilities of solitude and privacy legislation are key to mental wellbeing. Privacy legislation describes particular control over use of the home or even to oneis team (Altman 1975). Hence, which makes it clear that legislation of the kinds of solitude, mentioned previously, is just a purpose of both situational and individual elements. Private elements make reference to the personis requirement for solitude, private appeal, social abilities, character factors and capability to use privacy control systems (Pederson, 1999). Situational elements might be bodily or cultural. Interpersonal elements are individual and existence, readiness traits of other individuals who possess the possibility of social relationship. Actual elements involve elements for example obstacles, area, format and miles (Pederson, 1999).
Privacy's mental advantages replicate the event of solitude. Solitude facilitates cultural conversation which, consequently, influences our proficiency to cope with the world, which influences our home-description (Altman, 1975). Consequently, privacy's benefits occur from reaching its capabilities. Based on Margulis (2005) the advantages of solitude are:
Nevertheless Keenan (2005) recognizes additional groups that catch the types of advantages solitude retains for individuals:
Based on Veitch snd Arkkelin (1995) the capabilities of solitude are: the accomplishment of the home-identification and also the administration of relationships between yourself and also the cultural atmosphere. Based on Margulis (2005), solitude is essential since it offers us with encounters that assistance regular mental performance, steady social interactions, and individual improvement.
People have an absolute need to a particular degree of solitude within their houses. Solitude, within an new method, could be understood to be; the power of people and households to direct their very own lives without possibly interfering â?? or being interfered from the lifestyles of others (Goodchild 1997). Based on Faulkner ETAL (1994) a house offers solitude from outsiders with surfaces that guard the person from bodily, visible and different quantities of acoustical invasion. Moreover, Goodchild (1997) recognizes three kinds of solitude in creating a house, whether within the house or away from house:
Privacy means circumventing issues with neighbors. Issues might occur once the format of the kind of property and also the citizen isn't proper such as for instance; the closed section of each individualis house's surfaces are low which affects solitude.
Subsequently, solitude indicates a feeling of privacy. This means independence from independence and ignoring type unpleasant sound. This may be attained by utilizing greater surfaces and sound efficiency methods to improve area between neighbors.
Finally, solitude means independence from disruption from others, possibly associates or visitors of the exact same household, inside the house. The amount of various areas in relation determines the amount of solitude within the house to the household size. Faulkner et al (1994) additionally says the ground plan sets the solitude amounts where the house capabilities such as for instance; open-floor plan or shut floorplan.
Four facets of privacy legislation systems have now been recognized through information by Westin (1970) and London (1993). Privacy handles supply requirements of conduct for teams and people. Subsequently, solitude certainly will produce the notion to be on your own, and produces a choice between solitude and conversation. Finally, communities, teams, and people often enter others' solitude; attention is definitely an instance of the elements. Furthermore, as culture goes type primeval to modern, mental and the bodily possibilities for solitude boost.
Based on Bonnes ETAL (1995) and Altman (1975) individual room and territorial conduct are utilized by people mainly to manage privacy and also to preserve their visibility/closedness towards others at optimum amounts. Furthermore, Harris ETAL (1996) claim that when folks are confronted by damaging solitude encounters, they'll make use of a number of privacy legislation mechanisms including spoken and nonverbal behaviors, intellectual, ecological, temporary and social systems. Altman (1975) further shows that the usefulness and easy applying privacy legislation systems can vary significantly across people and across interpersonal, bodily and temporal framework. To be able to achieve the perfect degree of solitude therefore, by mixing these systems people may effectively convey their required degree of privacy.
Altman (1975) for knowing the systems of privacy legislation created a construction. This construction may be used like an overview of of all these facets of solitude (view figure 2). This number suggests that solitude is just a main idea that links the various phenomenons of ecological therapy (individual room, territoriality and crowding) with privacy legislation systems.
Because it includes a variety of meanings the trend territoriality is very prevalent within the area of ecological therapy. Based on Gifford (1997) you will find various factors that impact territoriality such as for instance; prominence, protection, turmoil, state conduct, excitement, caution, staking and knowledge to put. Gifford (1997) additionally says that the conventional description for territoriality is:
"is just a routine of perceptions and conduct kept by a person or team that's centered on perceived or real control of the definable real room, item or indisputable fact that might include marking and chronic profession, protection, printing of it."
Nevertheless territoriality, based on Veitch and Arkkelin (1995) could be understood to be:
Based on Altman (1975) areas occur to meet up both actual and interpersonal requirements, while being briefly or completely possessed, managed, designated or customized and possibly guarded by residents or owners. About the other hand, territoriality includes a particular group of efficient, intellectual and behavioral habits indicated towards the place (Altman 1975). Faulkner et al (1994) will follow Altman (1975), nevertheless shows that place is just a particularly described region possessed or managed and customized by defensive border indicators for example walls, indicators, nameplates, or occasionally behavioral tips as easy like a cool look.
Territoriality is associated with home- works and identification to a person's mental well-being in relation. Based on Proshansky et al (1983) inner determinants of territorial conduct are to keep and accomplish solitude. Faulkner et al (1994) expresses the idea of territoriality in people is strongly associated with the accomplishment and safety of solitude. Solitude, from numerous psychological traces, produces people consequently and offers a location of analysis of yourself.
Gifford (1997), Veitch and Arkkelin (1995) and Fraine ETAL (2007) identify two methods for classifying territorialities: the Altman system in addition to the Lyman and Scott program.
The Altman program â?? a vital feature for this program may be the level of solitude, connection or convenience. Moreover the machine recognizes three various kinds of territoriality.
The Lyman and Scott program â?? this technique overlaps using the previously discussed program and likewise recognized two more kinds of territoriality:
Veitch and Arkkelin (1995) state this 1 doesn't need to appear difficult to find persuasive proof of territorial conduct in people â?? experience for instance, the frequency of locks on gates, walls WITH NO TRESPASSING signs.
Gifford (1997) recognizes six kinds of conduct people depict in a few conditions.
Based on Altman (1975) territorial conduct should be regarded more precisely like a system which adjusts the edges of the home/additional through the procedure of printing or demarcation of locations of items held with a person or perhaps a team. Therefore, this system is advantageous for explaining the more common procedure underlying the connection between individuals and also the ecological room (Bonnes ETAL 1995).
Gifford (1997) says that territoriality ought to be analysed in each environment because it is just in choosing an element which results or not choosing a breeding ground. Moreover, the look of the specific room must attempt to reduce hostility, improve handle and motivate a feeling of safety and purchase.
Based on Faulkner ETAL (1994) remarkable of our mental recognition with "our" location is our perspective of possessiveness and agreement of individual items and fixtures within it. "our" place's meaning shows that it's a location where we people frequently experience we feel guarded, be revolutionary, talk our individuality are able to use control around and secure it. Gifford (1997) further shows that folks are impossible to change additional or furniture preparations in areas that are public simply because they are not seen by them as their own if no body else promises the area like a main place. Demirbas and Demirkan (2000) state that lots of people spot personal possessions within an atmosphere to determine their place.
ALTMAN. 1975. Social and the surroundings behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
BECHTEL, R.B., CHURCHMAN, A. A, & TS'ERTS'MAN. 2002. Handbook of ecological psychology. John Wiley. 722p.
BELL, P.A., GREENE, T.C., FISHER, J.D. & BAUM, A.S. 2005. Ecological psychology. Ed. Routledge. 634p.
BONNES, M. 2003. Overview of ecological therapy: methods and concepts. Journal of ecological psychology. 23.
BONNES, M., SECCHIAROLI, GARY. C, & MONTAGNA. 1995. Ecological therapy: a psycho- launch that is cultural. 230 g.
CANTER, D. 1997. Place's facets: improvements in style, conduct, and atmosphere. Press: Ny. 109-147p.
CASAKIN, H.P. S, & KREITLER. 2008. Location connection like a purpose of meaning task. Ecological technology. 2.
CASSIDY, T. 1997. Ecological therapy: expertise and conduct in situation. Therapy media. 282p.
CASTELLO. M. 2006. City and location: linking the idea op place. Journal of ecological psychology. 1, 1-11.
DEMIRBAS, O.O. H, & DEMIRKAN. 2000. Privacy measurements: an incident review within the internal structure design business. Journal of ecological psychology. 20.
DE YOUNG, R. 1999. Environmental Psychology. Encyclopaedia of Environmental Science. Hingham. MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
DING, S. 2008. Customers' privacy choices in open-plan practices. Emerald Group. 26.
DIXON, J. K, & DURRHEIM. 2000. Displacing location-identification: a method of finding others yet home. British record of psychology. 39.
FAULKNER, R., FAULKNER, S. L, & NISSEN. 1994. Inside the house of today's. Ed. Thompson understanding: Wadsworth. 672p.
FRAINE, G., CRUZ, S.G., ZINKIEWICZ, L., CHAPMAN, R. M, & SHEEHAN. 2007. Athome on the highway? May motorists' associations using their vehicles be related to territoriality? Journal of ecological psychology. 27.
GARLING, T. R, & GOLLEDGE. 1993. Conduct and Setting: Physical Methods and Mental. Amsterdam: North Holland.
GIFFORD, R. 1997. Ecological psychology: methods and concepts. 2nd ed. Boston: Sausage and Allyn. 504p.
GOODCHILD, B. 1997. Property and also the elegant atmosphere: helpful information to property style. Blackwell Science. 330p.
GRITZALIS, S., KARYDA, M., PLAYGROUND, H.J., & KOKOLAKIS, S. 2009. Reasonable and Solitude data methods in environments that are common. Team that is emerald. 19.
HALPENNY, E. 2005. Professional-atmosphere motives: analyzing the impact of ecological perceptions, location connection, location satisfaction toward pro- behaviour. Canadian organization of leisure studies. 1-6p.
HARRIS, P.B., WERNER, C.M. & BROWN, B.B. 1996. Privacy legislation and location connection: forecasting attachment to some pupil family housing service. Journal of ecological psychology. 16.
HARRIS, P.B., WERNER, C.M., BROWN, B.B. & INGEBRITSEN, N. 1995. Move and privacy legislation: a cross cultural evaluation. Journal of ecological psychology. 15.
HAUGE, A.L. 2007. Identification and location. Journal of ecological psychology. 1-10.
HÃ?LSCHER, C., BÃ?CHNER, S.J., MEILINGER, T. G, & STRUBE. 2009. Adaptivity of wayfinding methods in a multiple-building outfit: the results of full info, job needs and spatial framework. Journal of ecological psychology. 29, 208-219.
HÃ?LSCHER, C., MEILINGER, T., VRACHLIOTIS, G., BRÃ?SAMLE, M. M, & KNAUFF. 2006. Up the stairway that is down: wayfinding methods and multi level structures. Journal of ecological psychology. 26.
IACHINI, T., RUOTOLO, Y. G, & RUGGIERO. 2009. The results of sex and knowledge on representation. Journal of ecological psychology. 29.
INALHAN, H & FINCH, ELIZABETH. 2004. Location of belonging connection and feeling. Team that is emerald. 22.
KAPLAN, S. & R. KAPLAN. 1982. Knowledge and Atmosphere. NY: Praeger.
KEENAN, K.M. 2005. Intrusion of solitude: a research guide. ABC: Clio. 259p.
LONDON, S. 1993. Domestic structure and also space's utilization: an cross cultural research. Cambridge: University press. 192p.
KNEZ, I. 2005. Connection and identification as associated with its own observed environment and a location. Journal of ecological psychology. 25.
MALGULIS, S.T. 2005. Privacy. Normative, cultural and mental views. Journal of ecological psychology. 1-26p.
MARSHALL, N.J. 1972. Privacy. Journal of ecology. 93-110.
MILLIGAN, M. 1998. Interactional past. Interaction. 21.
NDUBISI, Y. 2002. Environmental planning: a relative and historic activity. Center for American locations. 287p.
PASSINI, R. 1984. A viewpoint, representations. Journal of ecological psychology. 4.
PAYTON, M.A. 2003. Impact of cultural money and location connection on social activity. Journal of resources. 93.
PEDERSON, D.M. 1999. Design by solitude measurements for kinds of solitude. Journal of ecological psychology. 19.
PRESTOPNIK, J.L. & ROSKOS-EWOLDSON, W. 2000. The connection among strategy use, feeling of knowledge, intercourse, path and wayfinding power. Journal of ecological psychology. 20.
FAIRLY, G.H., CHIPUER, H.M. P, & BRAMSTON. 2003. Feeling of location amongst teenagers and people in feeling of neighborhood, two Australian cities: the discerning functions of location connection and location reliance with regards to spot identification. Journal of ecological psychology. 23.
PROSHANSKY, H.M. 1987. The area on ecological therapy: acquiring its potential. Handbook of ecological psychology. Ny: Kids & John Wiley.
PROSHANSKY, H.M., FABIAN, A.K. R, & KAMINOFF. 1983. Location-identification: actual planet socialisation of the home. Journal of ecological psychology. 3.
RELPH, E. 1976. Place. London: Pion.
SALMI, P. 2002. Wayfinding style: invisible obstacles to accessibility that is common. Effects. Informa styles. 6p.
SHUMAKER, S.A., & TAYLOR, R.B. 1983. Towards a caution of individuals-place associations: a type of connection to put. Ecological psychology: views and instructions. 219-251p.
SPIERS, H.J., & MAGUIRE, E.A. 2008. The powerful character of during wayfinding knowledge. Journal of ecological psychology. 28.
VEITCH, R. D, & ARKKELIN. 1995. Ecological psychology: an interdisciplinary perspective. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. 461p.
WESTIN, A. 1970. Privacy. New York: Atheneum. 487p.
WARZECHA, C.A., CALCIUM, D.W. & THOMPSON, J.L. 2000. Guests' connection towards the source: evaluating location connection in created and wildland configurations. Journal of resources. 4.